This morning, as we sat on the couch, sipping coffee and discussing our monetary situation, the doorbell rang. The FedEx guy had dropped off a little package on our doorstep and waved as he drove off:

It was no larger than a breadbox, but once she opened it, the genius of good package design was revealed:

She ordered the Core Duo model with 2 gigs of RAM and the maximum hard drive—essentially, the pimpin’est Mini money will buy. I’m absolutely green with envy.

This is going to be a HUGE leap for her. She’s been using a circa 1999 blue and white 400mhz G3 tower, and it’s showing its age.

Date posted: March 31, 2006 | Filed under art/design | Comments Off on Jen’s New Toy.

Cinema Genre Primers.
Primers on just about every different style of cinema out there. This is ammunition for several long weekends of screening. (via)

Date posted: March 30, 2006 | Filed under projects, shortlinks | Comments Off on Cinema Genre Primers.

Leonardo DiCaprio-SuperGeek.
Fanboys the world over are drooling, and women the world over are reconsidering their blind devotion. (thanks, Linda)

Date posted: March 29, 2006 | Filed under humor, shortlinks | Comments Off on Leonardo DiCaprio-SuperGeek.

Last week (or was it two weeks ago?) Jen and I hit a thrift store not too far from our house on a lazy sunday. In that store, nestled among the racks of threadbare sportcoats and flasher trenchcoats, was this little red gem from the era of leisure suits and platform heels. It’s a size or two too big for me, but the stitching, color and fabric are right on.


I have no idea who Tamari is, or where they come from, but they do make a damn fine coat.

Genuine Leather!

I am nothing if not a coat whore; Ask my lovely wife and she’ll tell you I have more coats than Imelda had shoes. But I couldn’t pass this one up.

Date posted: March 29, 2006 | Filed under humor | 3 Comments »

Broken Windows Theory. From the Boston Globe as well. I find this theory fascinating. There’s good info here-more reading to be done. (via)

Date posted: March 29, 2006 | Filed under politics, shortlinks | Comments Off on Broken Windows Theory.

Album/Song Of The Week.
Same ! @#$ Different Day, Lyrics Born. Check out “I Changed My Mind (Rattlesnake Mix)” or “Shake It Off”. Excellent beats, excellent remixes.

Date posted: March 28, 2006 | Filed under music, shortlinks | Comments Off on Album/Song Of The Week.

Font Management In OS X, part 177.
This ain’t over yet, kemosabe.

Date posted: March 28, 2006 | Filed under apple, shortlinks | Comments Off on Font Management In OS X, part 177.

Quark Redesigns Logo. Again.

Date posted: March 28, 2006 | Filed under design, shortlinks | Comments Off on Quark Redesigns Logo. Again.

From the introduction of Imperial Grunts, by Robert D. Kaplan:

Imperialism is but a form of isolationism, in which the demand for absolute, undefiled security at home leads one to conquer the world, and in the process to become subject to all the world’s anxieties. …By the time an imperial reality becomes truly manifest, it is a sign that the apex of empire is at hand, with a gradual retreat more likely than fresh conquests.

(The first sentence is attributed to Erich Gruen, from The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome. )

There is a lot to learn from this book, both from the civilian noncombatant side and from the political realist’s side. I’m attempting to do some illustrations for this book as a self-commissioned project, and I find the conflicting messages it contains hard to boil down into digestible images. One one hand, the special teams we place in foreign countries (and there are a lot more than you think there are, in places you never imagined) are training indigenous armies, helping the local populations with health and sanitation projects, and providing security for government officials. On the other hand, they are severely limited by the Rules of Engagement to certain numbers of advisors, specific locations of operation, methods of training, and ability to engage in combat, which limits their abilities to influence real change. While these limitations are debatable on a case-by-case basis, the idea that narcotrafficking in places like Columbia could be severely curtailed by a 6-month field operation by one Alpha team (suggested by an SF operative in the book) is a tempting one.

That fundamental reality, in contrast to the wild west atmosphere of Mongolia experienced by the Alpha teams stationed there, is a jarring one. What I’m attempting to convey is a sense of ability and professionalism—I don’t think any of these soldiers is bloodthirsty or evil, even if I might not agree with the policy that put them where they are—with the underlying sense of frustration I feel from the stories they tell. These are guys who live in a storage container inside barbed-wire fences in 105° heat for months at a time, in constant danger of assassination, who then immunize the local population and help dig wells for their crops. It’s also fascinating to read about the newer generation of non Vietnam-veteran soldiers complain about the hangovers still lingering from that war—and realize that those lessons are important. I’d like to believe that the initial U.S. involvement in Vietnam (a handful of Special Forces advisors to the democratic government in the early ’60’s) was not begun with the eventual ramp-up in mind, but I also see increased combatant-level involvement in foreign countries as the slippery slope it is. Finally, it’s refreshing and humbling to read about the individual soldiers, who are handpicked because of their abilities, intelligence, and maturity—a far cry from the Rambo/loose cannon propaganda we Americans are fed daily. As mass-market entertainment, the solutions on the current TV show “The Unit” are tidy 45-minute happy endings, but they reflect a childish, immature view of real world problems.

I’m only halfway through the book now, but I’d recommend it for anyone who is interested in the way America is attempting to fight smaller wars on multiple fronts in the 21st century, based on the idea that a few men with the right ideas can force a major turn of events:

The notion that vast historical forces could be tipped by the right individuals exerting pressure in the right spot has always offered an attractive antidote to fatalism.

* * *

I’ve also been working on self-commissioned illustrations for an article that ran in the New Yorker a month or so back, about the Administration’s ignorance and subjugation of science for its own purposes. The New York Times magazine ran an article a few months ago on the same subject, and it’s something that resonated with me.

This is my first tentative set of steps back into the conceptual pool, and it’s going slowly and painfully. My brain was wired pretty well when I was in college to think editorially, but those muscles are weak and puny now. I’ve been hitting up against this wall for a week now, and while I have some things resolved I still can’t make the whole thing work correctly.

But now I’ve spent enough time writing and not enough time thinking. Back to work.

Date posted: March 27, 2006 | Filed under books | 1 Comment »

Between backing up Jen on a large design job (suffering computer issues that warranted the purchase of a new Core Duo Mac Mini on Wednesday) and various other jobs for my clients, this week slipped past rather quickly. However, I spent part of this afternoon and the majority of the evening working on the Q entry for the Alphabet Project. I also collected a small but tardy invoice from last December, which will hopefully go towards an upgrade of my 1999-vintage PC. I’m looking at a refurbed Dell from a local vendor, trying to save a couple hundred bucks for a business class machine, but my father’s experience with his Dell has me wondering what vendor is best. What do you folks out there recommend?

Date posted: March 25, 2006 | Filed under art/design | 1 Comment »